The project is an attempt to problematize the political and scientific routes of one of the most prominent figures among the Bulgarian intelligentsia in the period of communist rule – Nikolai Genchev (1931-2000). The published commemorative volumes (2002, 2012), memoirs, documentaries (2011) as well as Iv. Znepolski research (2016) do not cancel the growing need to speak about N. Genchev's heritage critically and analytically, with the tools and horizons of modern historiographical analysis. That is why in this project I will try to answer many questions that were not answered in the mentioned publications, including some important issues that were just sketched in some previous studies. The first group of questions concerns Genchev’s political and intellectual formations in 1950s and 1960s. Special attention will be put to Genchev and his role for the legitimization of a sacred national narrative. One of the main focuses of the project will be the very specific and often self-restrained dissident thinking of Genchev. Special module of my project will be the analysis of highly debatable and contestable N. Genchev’s memoires. The Genchev’s break up with the Faculty of History and the journey to the Faculty of Philosophy will be the final step in my analysis.
How do writers perceive reading and what strategies do they employ in its politics? How could one read a text which resists narration, and how could one read a text that insists on rereading in order to be understood? How is reading presented in mid-20th-century fiction? What is 'blind reading', what is its relation to unreading and could we define reading as a form of blindness?
This research project focuses on the politics of (un)reading and the textual policies of mid-20th-century fiction. Politics of reading is understood as the specific textual strategies the works impose on their readers, the literary practices and policies that are used to gain and hold power in the text or to engage a reader. Vladimir Nabokov's and Maurice Blanchot's stories from the 30s-60s will serve to probe the prospective collaboration of cognitive approaches to literary narrative and reception theory. The role of gaps and context in the act of reading and their interaction with the reader as well as the relation reading – blindness will constitute the nodal points of discussion. The main objective of the interdisciplinary study is to find out how the two frameworks could work together and to outline a new cognitive reception theory. In addition, it will compare and contrast Nabokov's and Blanchot's theories of reading and their application in a mirroring cyclic recurrence: the required necessity for rereading and the impossibility of narrating.
The Turkish (and especially Ottoman Turkish) language periodicals, published after the Bulgarian state was reestablished in 1878, are still an obscure topic even for the scientific community. Building upon a successfully completed preliminary research about locating and digitization of selected periodicals, the main goal of this project is to utilize the publications in those periodicals to reconstruct the image of the Turkish speaking minority population in Bulgaria. The Bulgarian ummah was far from the homogenous entity as it is often deemed to have been. The temporal focus will be the 1923 – 1944 period when the internal segregation among the Muslims reached their peak. The disagreements were rooted in the varied opinions on the reforms of Mustafa Kemal (Atatürk) and especially the polemics on the introduction of the new Latin script, which one could speculate literally led to an Alphabet war. Two major groups emerged: Muslim traditionalists and Turkish nationalists, each eager to express and propagate their conflicting views on the newspaper pages.
The main objective of the project is to elaborate on the position of certain metal production technologies in regard to the particular social settings in which they were applied during Late Antiquity in the Balkans. An integrated research approach to this topic involves interpretation of diverse categories of evidence: (1) written sources about technologies and wider political and socio-historical developments of the period, (2) particular material evidence – finds and their context – discovered through archaeological fieldwork and surveys in Bulgaria, and (3) analytical data, or ‘micro-evidence’ obtained using scientific laboratory methods. The basis of the project comprises two archaeological assemblages of metal (copper and silver) production debris which have key importance for shaping a thorough perspective on centralized large-scale artisanal production that also featured a high degree of technological specialization and standardization. Understanding such complex technological phenomena begins with detailed study of the archaeological record but also includes its reading in relation to the socio-economic background and historical narratives. In this way, it is possible to reconstruct the likely state-dominated and governed milieu of these particular productions in the province of Dacia Mediterranea.
The proposed interdisciplinary research project aims to investigate the social and economic relations that influenced the structure of the communal life of Jews and Samaritans in the Byzantine empire. It will recover a neglected area of history, and contribute to the study of minorities within larger political structures. I aim to establish the place Jews and Samaritans occupied in the stratigraphy of Byzantine society and how the social and political changes in this society influenced their communal life. The scope of the project is defined temporally and spatially. It is proposed to begin in the fourth century and end in the eighth century. This will allow the inclusion of the widest possible selection of epigraphical, literary and archaeological sources. Geographically, the project will include the areas of the Balkans, the Aegean and Asia Minor. The proposed end-date of my project takes into account the limitation of evidence for Jews and Samaritans in the areas already mentioned for the period of the ninth century until the eleventh century. The geographical scope has been defined by the evidence from the areas concerned, which is less studied and requires a new investigation and analysis.
The project seeks to understand and explain the ways in which return migration of health professionals affects the transformations of medical practice at an individual and at a systemic level. The particular focus is on returning medical specialists in the field of prenatal, natal, and neonatal care. The research will use a mixed-methods approach integrating qualitative in-depth interviews with health professionals and various actors in their networks, and policy analysis of the institutional framework. Drawing on the concept of medical habitus, the project formulates the hypothesis that return migration creates the potential for transformations in the medical practices by exposing mobile professionals to alternative medical systems and modes of practice. It thus aims to examine the role of returning health professionals as drivers of change, for the advancement of knowledge transfer and improvement of health systems at home. Given this research agenda, the project will examine three interrelated questions: How do returning health professionals experience and asses differences in medical practices and health systems? How do health professionals re-integrate in their home health systems and what kind of networks do they build? What transformative steps do returning health professionals take to advance medical knowledge and practice in their home countries?