BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//ЦАИ - ECPv6.7.0//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:ЦАИ
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://cas.bg/bg/
X-WR-CALDESC:Събития за ЦАИ
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Sofia
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0300
TZNAME:EEST
DTSTART:20200329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0300
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:EET
DTSTART:20201025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0300
TZNAME:EEST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0300
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:EET
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210429T163000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210429T180000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20210217T134528Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210423T125904Z
UID:11001-1619713800-1619719200@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Fellow Seminar: Competing Interests. State and Private actors in the Development of Black Sea Infrastructure in Russia and Bulgaria (1856–1914)
DESCRIPTION:Dr. Lyubomir Pozharliev (MON Fellow\, Oct ‘20 – Jun ‘21) will give his second talk on the progress of his research at CAS on the topic: \nCompeting Interests. State and Private actors in the Development of Black Sea Infrastructure in Russia and Bulgaria (1856–1914)\nHe will present more details on \nThe Case of the Russian Steam Navigation and Trading Company (ROPiT)\n29 April\, 2021 at 16:30 h. \nModerated by Prof. Roumen Avramov. \n– \nAbstract \nThis presentation is focused on the development of transport infrastructure and shipping in the Black Sea region by examining the case study of the establishment and initial development of the Russian Steam Navigation and Trading Company (ROPiT) from 1856 to the end of the 19th century. ROPiT was a joint-stock company co-owned by private entrepreneurs and the state. As the main problem of the study is the interrelation between a state-constructed public interest and private interests of entrepreneurs in the development of the Black sea maritime infrastructure\, the focus of the presentation will be the relationship between Russian state imperial interests and the economic interests of the entrepreneurs and merchants\, shareholders in ROPiT. The presenter follows Thomas Hughes’s understanding of infrastructure as large technological systems\, whose components are not only physical artifacts but also organizations\, knowledge\, legislative artifacts\, etc. In that aspect the presentation will introduce the concept of systemic actors – they are those\, who imagine the construction of the infrastructure as a system project. The following questions will be discussed: How did the foundation and development of the Russian Steam Navigation and Trading Company become possible – in terms of context and initiators? What were the strategies for developing maritime infrastructure of the entrepreneurs and of the representatives of the state\, what was the relationship between state and private interests? The biographies of the two key actors\, Nikolaj Arkas (the defender of the imperial interests) and Nikolaj Novosel’skij (the representative of the entrepreneurs) are placed in the middle of the investigation. Both were founders and first directors of ROPiT and had an access to multiple resources – mobility\, networks\, knowledge\, political support and more. The presentation will argue that Novosel’skij and Arkas could be defined as systemic actors and transcultural mediators. It also oppose the thesis that the development of the Russian Empire followed the „strong arm“ of centralized state power\, arguing that in the studied case the successful development of transport infrastructure resulted from a complex intertwining of both types of interests – imperial and entrepreneurial and of the systemic visions of its key actors.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/fellow-seminar-competing-interests-state-and-private-actors-in-the-development-of-black-sea-infrastructure-in-russia-and-bulgaria-1856-1914/
LOCATION:Zoom Platform
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/pozharliev-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20210419
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20210425
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20200601T133808Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210421T100040Z
UID:10237-1618790400-1619308799@cas.bg
SUMMARY:GETTY-CAS Archaeological Schools: Spring School 2021
DESCRIPTION:THE EVENTS FOR 2020 WERE POSTPONED due to COVID-19 – will take place in April 2021 via ZOOM / Bulgaria time zone (EEST) \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nLECTURES - 19\, 20\, 21 APRIL\n\n\n\nFIRST SPRING SCHOOL: THE IMPACT OF THE POLITICAL ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH\nApril 2021 (Sofia) \nPROGRAMME \nLECTURES\n*The time-slots include 45 min. presentation and 45 min. discussion \n19 April\, 2021 (Monday) \n11:00 – 12:30 Gheorghe Alexandru Niculescu (Romania) / „Vasile Pârvan“ Institute of Archaeology\, Bucharest – „The politics we are trained to ignore – part 1“ \n\n12:30 – 14:00 Lunch Break\n\n14:00 – 15:30 Gheorghe Alexandru Niculescu (Romania) / „Vasile Pârvan“ Institute of Archaeology\, Bucharest – „The politics we are trained to ignore – part 2“ \n\n15:30 – 16:15 Coffee Break\n\n16:15 – 17:45 Bettina Arnold (USA) / University of Wisconsin Milwaukee\, Anthropology – „The Relationship between Archaeology and Politics: Still Faustian but not much of a Bargain“ \n20 April\, 2021 (Tuesday) \n11:00 – 12:30 Susanne Grunwald (Germany) / Independent researcher – „History of archaeology as entangled history. The reorganization of the German Pre- and Protohistorical Archaeology after 1945“ \n\n12:30 – 14:00 Lunch break\n\n14:00 – 15:30 Dimitris Tziovas (UK/Greece) / University of Birmingham\, Centre for Byzantine\, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies – „The Parthenon and the Politics of Heritage: From Eternal Glory to Critical History“ \n\n15:30 – 16:15 Coffee Break\n\n16:15 – 17:45 Bettina Arnold (USA) / University of Wisconsin Milwaukee\, Anthropology – „The Warrior that Wasn’t: the Interplay between Politics and the Archaeology of Gender“ \n21 April\, 2021 (Wednesday) \n11:00 – 12:30 Dimitris Tziovas (UK/Greece) / University of Birmingham\, Centre for Byzantine\, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies – „The rediscoveries of Greece: From the ancient ruins to the ruins of crisis“ \n\n12:30 – 14:00 Lunch Break\n\n14:00 – 15:30 Dimitris Plantzos (Greece) / National and Kapodistrian University of Athens\, Department of History and Archaeology – „Archaeopolitics I: the second life of statues“ \n\n15:30 – 16:15 Coffee Break\n\n16:15 – 17:45 Dimitris Plantzos (Greece) / National and Kapodistrian University of Athens\, Department of History and Archaeology – „Archaeopolitics II: the everyday archaeologies of trauma“ \nProgramme (PDF) \nParticipants and Abstracts (PDF) \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nWORKSHOP - 22 APRIL\n\n\n\nTHE ARCHAEOLOGY OF ETHNIC PHENOMENA AND THE PERVASIVENESS OF METHODOLOGICAL NATIONALISM\nPROGRAMME \nWORKSHOP\n*The time-slots include 25 min. presentation and 15 min. discussion \n22 April\, 2021 (Thursday) \n\nMorning session / Moderator: James Harland\n\n10:00 – 10:40 Gheorghe Alexandru-Niculescu (Romania) / The Vasile Pârvan Institute of Archaeology „The ethnicization of the past through tacit understandings and explicit definitions” \n10:40 – 11:20 Hans Peter Hahn (Germany) / Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main\, Institut für Ethnologie Department „Power from Purity or power from Mixture? Two concepts of ethnic identity in the 19th century’s humanities.“ \n\n11:20 – 11:50 Coffee break\n\n11:50 – 12:30 Giorgos Vavouranakis (Greece) / National and Kapodistrian University of Athens\, Department of History and Archaeology „Hooked on Classics? Ethnocentrism and the methodology of prehistoric research in Greece“ \n12:30 – 13:10 Stefan Burmeister (Germany) / Museum und Park Kalkriese\, Museum Department „The culture concept as a Trojan horse of a nationalistic agenda?“ \n\n13:10 – 14:10 Lunch break\n\n\nAfternoon session / Moderator: Giorgos Vavouranakis\n\n14:10 – 14:50 James Harland (Germany) /Universität Tübingen\, Centre for Advanced Studies „Can We Infer Ethnic Identity from Material Culture? A Comparative Look at the Late Antique West“ \n14:50 – 15:30 Dimitris Plantzos (Greece) / National and Kapodistrian University of Athens\, Department of History and Archaeology „The excavation of the Amphipolis Tomb as an exercise in Greek necropolitics“ \n\n15:30 – 16:00 Coffee Break\n\n16:00 – 16:40 Bettina Arnold (USA) / University of Wisconsin Milwaukee\, Anthropology „The Perils of a Usable Past: Archaeology’s Journey from Culture History to Culture Wars”  \nProgramme (PDF) \nParticipants and Abstracts (PDF) \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nCOLLOQUIUM - 23 APRIL\n\n\n\nTHE IMPACT OF THE POLITICAL ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH\nPROGRAMME \nCOLLOQUIUM\n*The time-slots include 20 min. presentation and 10 min. discussion \n23 April\, 2021 (Friday) \n\nMorning session / Moderator: Gheorghe Alexandru Niculescu\n\n10:00-10:30 Ivo Strahilov (Bulgaria) / Sofia University\, Department of History and Theory of Culture „Shared and Contested: Cultural Heritage of Southeastern Europe in National\, Regional and European Perspective. The case of Trebenishte Necropolis“ \n10:30-11:00 Anastasia Vergaki (Greece) / National and Kapodistrian University of Athens\, Department of History and Archaeology „Searching for the Power of the Multitude: political and ritual dimensions of Minoan neopalatial domestic architecture“ \n11:00-11:30 Zenta Broka-Lace (Latvia) / University of Latvia\, Faculty of History and Philosophy „Archaeological ethics under the hammer and sickle in Latvia (1940-1941; 1944-1991)“ \n\n11:30 – 12:00 Coffee Break\n\n12:00-12:30 Oana Dichel (Romania) / „Babeş-Bolyai“ University in Cluj-Napoca\, Doctoral School History. Civilization. Culture within the Faculty of History and Philosophy „Involvement of the political factor in the research and promotion of archeology in Romania post ’89“ \n12:30-13:00 Hüseyin Burak Soy (Turkey) / Middle East Technical University\, Settlement Archaeology „Peace and Conflict on Heritage: A Comparison of Greece and Turkey World Heritage Lists for the Study of the Concept of Heritage as a Tool for Peace“ \n\n13:00 – 14:00 Lunch Break\n\n\nAfternoon session / Moderator: Dimitris Plantzos\n\n14:00-14:30 Miglena Stamberova (Bulgaria) / Bulgarian Academy of Sciences\, Department of Thracian Archaeology „Archaeology during the Communism in Bulgaria“ \n14:30-15:00 Klairi Gianniri (Greece) / National & Kapodistrian University of Athens\, Department of History and Archaeology „Politics on a small scale: Archaeological ethnography as a lens of understanding community politics“ \n15:00-15:30 Paulina Florjanowicz (Poland) / Polish Academy of Sciences\, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology „Polish archaeologists’ approach towards Nazism and Stalinism (1939 – 1956)“ \n\n15:30 – 16:00 Coffee Break\n\n16:00-16:30 Natalija Cosic (Serbia) / University of Belgrade\, Department of Archeology „Making-of Lepenski Vir“ \n16:30-17:00 Cosmin Minea (UK/Romania) / University of Birmingham\, Department of Art History „Transnational Relations and National Identity: The Renewal of the Architectural Heritage in 19th Century Romania“ \nProgramme (PDF) \nParticipants and Abstracts (PDF) \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nVIRTUAL TOUR - 24 APRIL\n\n\n\n24 April\, 2021 (Saturday) \n10:00-12:00 Virtual visit (3D Tour: http://naim.bg/en/tour/) – National Archeological Museum\, Sofia \nEach participant will do the tour on their own and think on the following questions: \na/ what is better or worse than what could have happened during an on-site museum visit? \nb/ the difference between the two kinds of experiences regarding the political meanings conveyed by the museum and its exhibits? \n\n12:00 – 13:00 Lunch break\n\n13:00 – 14:30 LIVE talk by Dr. Kamen Boyadziev ||Head of Exhibitions\, National Archaeological Institute with Museum\, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences||\, followed by a discussion
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/getty-cas-archaeological-schools-spring-school-2021/
LOCATION:Zoom Platform
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/uta-scholl-EjR4AeJ5U_o-unsplash.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20210417
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20210419
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20200601T125652Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210416T093200Z
UID:10780-1618617600-1618790399@cas.bg
SUMMARY:GETTY-CAS Archaeological Schools: Opening conference
DESCRIPTION:THE EVENTS FOR 2020 WERE POSTPONED due to COVID-19 – will take place in April 2021 via ZOOM / Bulgaria time zone (EEST) \n\n\n\nOPENING CONFERENCE \n“Looking at Things in Southeastern Europe: Regional Archaeology in Search of Viable Futures” \n17-18 April 2021 \n*The time-slots include 25 min. presentation and 20 min. discussion \n*Bulgaria time zone (EEST) \n17 April\, 2021 (Saturday) \n10:15 – 10:30 Opening words – Diana Mishkova\, Gheorghe Alexandru Niculescu\, Dimitris Plantzos \n\nMorning session / Moderator: Staša Babić\n\n10:30 – 11:15 Gheorghe Alexandru Niculescu (Romania) / „Vasile Pârvan“ Institute of Archaeology\, Bucharest – „Trying to do what we are told: dominated thinking in archaeology“ \n11:15 – 12:00 Dimitris Plantzos (Greece) / National and Kapodistrian University of Athens\, Department of History and Archaeology -„Artefacts to things: the anthropological shift in archaeological discourse and its repercussions for the study of material culture“ \n\n12:00 – 12:30 Coffee Break\n\n12:30 – 13:15 Deniz Burcu Erciyas (Turkey) / Middle East Technical University\, Graduate School of Social Sciences\, Settlement Archaeology – „Archaeology Education\, Practice and Theory in Turkey“ \n\n13:15 – 14:15 Lunch Break\n\n\nAfternoon session / Moderator: Yannis Papadatos\n\n14:15 – 15:00 Aleksandar Palavestra (Serbia) / University of Belgrade\, Faculty of Philosophy\, Department of Archaeology – „The Lost Step. Serbian Culture-Historical Archaeology and the Problem of Continuity“ \n15:00 – 15:45 Boyan Dumanov (Bulgaria) / New Bulgarian University\, Archaeology Department – „Archaeology in the Service of State: Interwar actions and Postwar transformations in Bulgaria“ \n\n15:45 – 16:15 Coffee Break\n\n16:15 – 17:00 Giorgos Vavouranakis (Greece) / National and Kapodistrian University of Athens\, Department of History and Archaeology – „Old dogs and new tricks: paradigmatic continuity and change in Aegean prehistoric archaeology“ \n18 April\, 2021 (Sunday) \n\nMorning session / Moderator: Deniz Burcu Erciyas\n\n10:30 – 11:15 Monika Milosavljević (Serbia) / University of Belgrade\, Department of Archaeology – „The Development and Change of Archaeological Knowledge in the Former Yugoslavia: a Fleckian Perspective“ \n11:15 – 12:00 Predrag Novaković (Slovenia) / University of Ljubljana\, Department of Archaeology\, Faculty of Arts – „Cohabitation\, hybridisation and eclecticism of archaeological paradigms: Modern Slovenian archaeology and the legacy of the 1980s“ \n\n12:00 – 12:30 Coffee Break\n\n12:30 – 13:15 Radu-Alexandru Dragoman (Romania) / The Vasile Pârvan Institute of Archaeology\, Prehistory Department – „Forgetting our own lives: self-colonization\, anticommunism and capitalist ideology in the Romanian archaeology of today“ \n\n13:15 – 14:15 Lunch Break\n\n\nAfternoon session / Moderator: Aleksandar Palavestra\n\n14:15 – 15:00 Rajna Sosic Klindzic (Croatia) / University of Zagreb\, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences – „The tradition of tradition in Croatian Archaeology“ \n15:00 – 15:45 Staša Babić (Serbia) / University of Belgrade\, Faculty of Philosophy\, Department of Archaeology – „Systematizing Archaeological Practices and Knowledges“ \n\n15:45 – 16:15 Coffee Break\n\n16:15 – 17:00 Yiannis Papadatos (Greece) / National & Kapodistrian University of Athens – „Regional surface surveys as a step forward: some thoughts on the basis of the Greek case study“ \n\nProgramme (PDF)\nParticipants and Abstracts (PDF)
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/getty-cas-archaeological-schools-opening-conference/
LOCATION:Zoom Platform
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/7.Provadia.Bulgaria.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210416T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210416T180000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20210224T131053Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210409T105417Z
UID:10976-1618588800-1618596000@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Серия семинари: „Форми на притежание – собствеността в комунистическа България“
DESCRIPTION:Центърът за академични изследвания София (ЦАИ) стартира цикъл от семинари на тема \nФорми на притежание: собствеността в комунистическа България\nЧетвъртата ни среща ще има следното съдържание и насоченост: \nЛектор: проф. Румен Аврамов \nСобствеността от гледна точка на икономическата наука през годините на социализма\n16 април 2021 г. (петък) от 16:00.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/seminar-series-forms-of-ownership-property-in-communist-bulgaria/
LOCATION:Zoom Platform
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/das-kapital-Marx.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210415T163000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210415T180000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20210224T132650Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210224T132650Z
UID:10935-1618504200-1618509600@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Fellow Seminar: Hidden Madness: Mental Health Governance in Socialist Bulgaria
DESCRIPTION:Dr. Vladimir Nakov (MON Fellow\, Oct ‘20 – Jun ‘21) will give his second talk on the progress of his research at CAS on the topic: \nHidden Madness: Mental Health Governance in Socialist Bulgaria\n15 April\, 2021 at 16:30 h.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/fellow-seminar-hidden-madness-mental-health-governance-in-socialist-bulgaria/
LOCATION:Zoom Platform
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/nakov-2-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210408T163000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210408T180000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20210219T135140Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210401T111920Z
UID:10942-1617899400-1617904800@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Fellow Seminar: Social Networks and Sofia Vernaculars at the Dawn of the Bulgarian National Language
DESCRIPTION:Dr. Grace E. Fielder (Advanced Academia Fellow\, Mar – July ‘21) will present her research under the topic: \nSocial Networks and Sofia Vernaculars at the Dawn of the Bulgarian National Language\non 8 April\, 2021 (Thursday) at 16:30 h. \n– \nAbstract \nThe current project is a historical sociolinguistic study of the spoken language of Sofia before and after 1879 when the newly formed government relocated from Veliko Tărnovo in the eastern dialect area to Sofia in the western dialect area. The goal is to both to document the language of literate speakers living in Sofia as well as investigate the social dynamics of the tension between the eastern and western variants during the process of standardization of Bulgarian in which the eastern dialect base eventually predominated. This then will be a language history “from below”\, i.e. an alternative language history of the vernacular language rather than the standard\, literary language as well as of marginalized speakers\, particularly women. Using written letters which are the best evidence available for oral speech in 19th century Sofia\, I use social network theory to examine the effect of social relationships on the maintenance of western vernacular features versus the adoption of the more socially prestigious eastern features of the standard language. It is hypothesized based on similar research on the Belfast vernacular by Milroy and on 15th century English by Bergs that strong (dense multiplex) network ties favor the maintenance of vernacular even stigmatized features while weak (loose\, uniplex) network ties lead to innovation and change. \nGrace E. Fielder is Professor Emerita in the Department of Russian and Slavic Studies at the University of Arizona. She holds a PhD in Slavic Linguistics from the University of California at Los Angeles and her research interests are in the historical and contemporary sociolinguistics of the Balkan languages. Recent publications include “The Semiotics of Ideology: the Bulgarian Definite Article Rule” (2019)\, “Takin’ it to the Streets: Language Ideology in post-1989 Bulgaria” (2019)\, “A Constellation of Greek Adversative Connectives?” (2019)\, and “Bible Translation and Language Recognition on Balkan Slavic Territory” (2018). Grace was also part of the team that translated Aleko Konstantinov’s Bai Ganyo: Incredible Tales of a Modern Bulgarian (2010) into English. She serves on the National Policy Advisory Committee for the Slavic and Eurasian Language Resource Center at Duke University and has held research grants from Fulbright\, IREX\, ACLS and the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/fellow-seminar-slavic-and-balkan-linguistics-social-networks-and-sofia-vernaculars-at-the-dawn-of-the-bulgarian-national-language/
LOCATION:Zoom Platform
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Fielder.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210401T163000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210401T180000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20210219T093915Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210401T111634Z
UID:10949-1617294600-1617300000@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Fellow Seminar: Psychotherapy\, Spirituality and the Inner Self: Post-Secular Subjectivities Among the Romanian Middle Class
DESCRIPTION:Dr. Sorin Gog will present his research under the topic: \nPsychotherapy\, Spirituality and the Inner Self: Post-Secular Subjectivities Among the Romanian Middle Class\non 1 April\, 2021 (Thursday) at 16:30 h. \nModerated by Dr. Vladimir Nakov \n– \nAbstract \nThe research project focuses on the emergence of spiritualized forms of psychotherapy and self-help psychologies that have become an important component of the booming industry of personal and spiritual growth in Romania and throughout Western and Eastern Europe and aims at analyzing the paradigmatic shift taking place in psychology and in psychotherapeutic practices that are employed in modeling a new form of subjectivity. By drawing on Michel Foucault’s\, Nikolas Rose’s and Charles Taylor’s work I am looking at how these emergent psychotherapies are producing bio-political technologies that attempt to governmentalize both old and new capitalist societies. I am interested in analyzing the way these new spiritual psychotherapies operate and how they generate a new subjective interiority based on self-development and self-realization and on a new understanding of personal authenticity that is becoming increasingly popular in Romania\, through academic and professional networks\, books\, digital media and public lectures and the establishment of new psychological associations. The embedding of spiritual practices in the psychotherapeutic counseling\, such as familial constellations\, Bowen therapy\, holotropic breathing\, various forms of meditation\, etc. signals an important shift in the way psychological healing of anxieties\, depressions or dysfunctionalities are conceptualized\, and the type of inner self that professionals cultivate. It is this spiritual-scientific mediation of subjectivity that becomes an important tool which is used by a growing segment of the Romanian middle class to transform itself and deal with the new challenges of contemporary society. Traditional religions are considered in this milieu a thing of the past – spiritualized psychotherapy opens the space for a new cosmopolite and scientific understanding of who we are as human beings and how can we live a successful\, prosperous and meaningful life. \nSorin Gog is a sociologist and anthropologist working at Babeș-Bolyai University in Cluj-Napoca where he teaches courses on social theories\, methodology of sociological research and sociology of religion. He has been a research fellow at Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies (Finland)\, CEU-IAS (Hungary)\, New Europe College (Romania)\, Institut für Wissenschaft der Menschen (Austria)\, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology (Germany) and University of Fribourg (Switzerland). His recent publication includes a co-edited volume on spirituality\, work and neo-liberalism\, titled ‘Spirituality\, Organization and Neoliberalism\, Understanding Lived Experiences’\, Edward Elgar\, published in 2020.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/fellow-seminar-psychotherapy-spirituality-and-the-inner-self-post-secular-subjectivities-among-the-romanian-middle-class/
LOCATION:Zoom Platform
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/gog-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210326T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210326T180000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20200520T171517Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210405T095104Z
UID:6527-1616774400-1616781600@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Дискусионна поредица „Политики на правовата държава”
DESCRIPTION:Осмият семинар от поредицата \nПолитики на правовата държава\nще се проведе на 26 март 2021 г. от 16:00ч. чрез платформата Zoom. \nПроф. д-р Евелина Келбечева ще изнесе лекция на тема: \nАнахронизъм или закономерност? Изучаването на комунистическия режим в България в контекста на “справедливостта на прехода”\nДостъп до лекцията:\nhttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/89959377043?pwd=TUliOGRkRmw2dXNiMkg3Ykl3TXg3Zz09 \nMeeting ID: 899 5937 7043\nPasscode: 619949 \nЛекцията проследява историята на изследването и оценката на комунистическия режим в България\, и в частност на битката за адекватното му представяне в училищните програми и учебници. Този процес\, който би трябвало да бъде започнат веднага след падането на комунистическия режим\, едва през 2000 г. намира – поне декларативно – юридическо основание с приемането на Закона за обявяване на комунистическия режим за престъпен. Но конкретен успех в реформирането на историческото образование е постигнат през 2019 г.\, тридесет години след срутването на Стената. На фона на Пражката декларация „Европейската съвест и тоталитаризма”\, инициирана от Вацлав Хавел и Йоаким Гаук през 2008 г. и нейното приемане и ратифизиране у нас\, българския опит се вижда като анахронично развитие в сравнителен план с другите страни от Източния блок. \nПроф. д-р Евелина Келбечева е професор в Американския Университет в България\, Благоевград. Преподава европейска история и история на България там от 1996 г.. Между 2002 – 2005 г. е Jean Monnet Title Holder.  Завършила е специалност история и археология в СУ „Св. Климент Охридски“. Била е Фулбрайтов стипендиант и гостуващ преподавател в Университета на Калифорния\, Ървайн (1992-1996). Стипендиант е на Центъра за Академични изследвания през 2014 г.. От 2014 г. е член на Издателския борд на академичната серия Балканистичен форум\, Югозападен Университет Неофит Рилски\, Благоевград\, издание\, на което е признат SCOPUS фактор. Нейните интереси са в областта на изследването на митовете и фалшификациите в историята през модерната епоха\, както и на историческата и културна идентичност в пост-тоталитарния период.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/%d0%b4%d0%b8%d1%81%d0%ba%d1%83%d1%81%d0%b8%d0%be%d0%bd%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%bf%d0%be%d1%80%d0%b5%d0%b4%d0%b8%d1%86%d0%b0-%d0%bf%d0%be%d0%bb%d0%b8%d1%82%d0%b8%d0%ba%d0%b8-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%bf%d1%80/
LOCATION:Zoom Platform
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/tingey-injury-law-firm-yCdPU73kGSc-unsplash-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210318T163000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210318T180000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20210219T135219Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210225T110741Z
UID:10947-1616085000-1616090400@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Fellow Seminar: Public Scandals over Curricula and Textbooks in Bulgaria (1992–2019)
DESCRIPTION:Dr. Albena Hranova (Pforzheimer Fellow\, Mar – Jul ‘21) will present her research proposal on the topic: \nLiterature and Historiography: Public Scandals over Curricula and Textbooks in Bulgaria (1992–2019) \n18 March\, 2021 at 16:30 h. \nModerated by Tchavdar Marinov
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/fellow-seminar-public-scandals-over-curricula-and-textbooks-in-bulgaria-1992-2019/
LOCATION:Zoom Platform
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/hranova-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210311T163000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210311T180000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20210125T132938Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210224T132239Z
UID:10824-1615480200-1615485600@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Fellows seminar: A Possible Ally from the East: The Habsburg Intelligence and the Ottoman-Safavid Rivalry\, 1560s–1610s.
DESCRIPTION:Dr. Aneliya Stoyanova will give her second talk on the progress of her research on the topic: \nA Possible Ally from the East: The Habsburg Intelligence and the Ottoman-Safavid Rivalry\, 1560s–1610s.\non 11 March\, 2021 (Thursday) at 16:30 h.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/fellows-seminar-a-possible-ally-from-the-east-the-habsburg-intelligence-and-the-ottoman-safavid-rivalry-1560s-1610s/
LOCATION:Zoom Platform
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/habsburg-ottoman-rivalry.jpeg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210224T163000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210224T183000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20210125T133019Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210218T094909Z
UID:10826-1614184200-1614191400@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Fellow Seminar: A Different Approach into the Philosophical Anthropology: Rethinking the Human through its Antonyms
DESCRIPTION:Prof. Christo Stoev will present his research proposal on the topic: \nA Different Approach into the Philosophical Anthropology: Rethinking the Human through its Antonyms\non on 25 February\, 2021 (Thursday) at 16:30 h. \nModerated by Asiya Bulatova \n– \nAbstract \nThe project builds on a simple thesis. In order to think through the human in general and to understand our own self-reflective cultural image as humans\, we need to consider what we comprehend as opposite or even just different from the human. So\, the main focus of the project will be analysis of the function of the antonyms that we have for the word human. These could be divided into two types: explicit and implicit antonyms. Explicit antonyms are formed with negative\nprefixes like non-\, un-\, in-\, anti-. The examples are: nonhuman\, unhuman\, inhumane\, antihuman. Implicit antonyms are not formed with prefixes and they do not share the same root as the word human. Examples could be: beast\, monster\, machine\, alien\, barbarian\, impure and so on. These implicit antonyms are interesting case because they are loaded with long cultural legacy. \nA special focus of the analysis will be devoted to the cases of the nonhuman and the inhumane. As suggested by the two very different words in English our intuitions in this semantic field are divided into two basic types. On one hand\, these are intuitions on that which the human is not (the nonhuman) and on the other hand intuitions on what the human should not be (the inhumane). These layers respectively reveal the descriptive and normative modes of our thinking on the human condition. The intuitions in question need to be philosophically conceptualized in order to understand their scope\, limits\, and claim to universality. Thus\, light can be thrown on the very recent theoretical conceptions that seem to question our commitment to the humanist ideas. This should provide a more clear-cut interpretation on what it means to strive for a trans-humanist or a post-humanist world.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/fellow-seminar-a-different-approach-into-the-philosophical-anthropology-rethinking-the-human-through-its-antonyms/
LOCATION:Център за академични изследвания София\, ул. Стефан Караджа 7В\, вх. 3\, ет. 2\, ап. 23\, София\, ‎ ‎1000‎ ‎\, Bulgaria
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/jheronomus-bosch.jpeg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210218T163000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210218T183000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20210125T133036Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210125T133036Z
UID:10830-1613665800-1613673000@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Fellow seminar: The Chaplin Vaccine. Taylorism and Immunization in Early-Soviet Film Theory and Fiction
DESCRIPTION:Dr. Asiya Bulatova will present her research under the topic: \nThe Chaplin Vaccine: Taylorism and Immunization in Early-Soviet Film Theory and Fiction\non 18 February\, 2021 (Thursday) at 16:30 h. \nModerated by Alexander Popov
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/fellow-seminar-the-chaplin-vaccine-taylorism-and-immunization-in-early-soviet-film-theory-and-fiction/
LOCATION:Център за академични изследвания София\, ул. Стефан Караджа 7В\, вх. 3\, ет. 2\, ап. 23\, София\, ‎ ‎1000‎ ‎\, Bulgaria
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/25SOVIETPICTURESJP3-superJumbo.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210129T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210129T180000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20210125T132704Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210125T132803Z
UID:10819-1611936000-1611943200@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Серия семинари: „Форми на притежание – собствеността в комунистическа България“
DESCRIPTION:Центърът за академични изследвания София (ЦАИ) стартира цикъл от семинари на тема \nФорми на притежание: собствеността в комунистическа България\nТретата ни среща ще има следното съдържание и насоченост: \nЗаконът за наследството от 1949 г. и битката за социалистическо наследяване\nЛектор: д-р Васил Петров\, съдия в СРС \nВодещ: доц. д-р Стоян Ставру \n29 януари 2021 г. (петък)\, 16:00 ч.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/%d1%81%d0%b5%d1%80%d0%b8%d1%8f-%d1%81%d0%b5%d0%bc%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%80%d0%b8-%d1%84%d0%be%d1%80%d0%bc%d0%b8-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%bf%d1%80%d0%b8%d1%82%d0%b5%d0%b6%d0%b0%d0%bd%d0%b8%d0%b5-2/
LOCATION:Zoom Platform
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/gd-greets-the-masses.jpeg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210128T163000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210128T183000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20210125T133052Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210125T133244Z
UID:10834-1611851400-1611858600@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Fellow Seminar: Oath-Taking and Oath-Breaking in Byzantium
DESCRIPTION:Dr. Savvas Kyriakidis will present his research under the topic: \nOath-Taking and Oath-Breaking in Byzantium\non 28 January\, 2021 (Thursday) at 16:30 h. \nModerated by Vladimir Nakov \nAbstract \nOaths were one of the main mechanisms that sustained the legal\, economic and political structure of Byzantium. They played an important role in the cultural life of the Byzantine empire. The first part of this paper discusses the religious objections to swearing as they are expressed by early Christian and Patristic authors in the fourth and fifth centuries. Authors such as Gregory of Nazianzus and John the Chrysostom followed the New Testament’s rejection of oaths\, opposed what they considered excessive use of swearing and claimed that oaths do not prove the reliability of a person.\nThe second part of this presentation examines the description of oaths in law collections. The sixth-century Justinianic laws and the ninth-century Basilica describe in detail the large variety of oaths that were sworn in Byzantine courts and oath rituals. Moreover\, collections of decisions such as that of the Archbishop of Ohrid Demetrios Chomatenos provide important information on the use of oaths court and on the social background of those who swore.\nThe next part of this paper focuses on the use of alternatives to swearing. The thirteenth century saw the increasing appearance of the ordeal by hot iron and the threat of excommunication as replacement to oath rituals. I discuss the debate regarding the origins of the introduction of these customs to Byzantium and the reaction of Byzantine legal authorities.\nThe last part of this presentation discusses the concept of conspiracy in Byzantium. Emperors were wary of any type of oaths beyond their control. According to the eighth-century law collection Ecloga\, anyone who forms a faction or a conspiracy against the emperor should be punished by death. Byzantium did not see the development of sworn associations similar to those of Western Europe. Nevertheless\, all major conspiracies and rebellions against the throne involved the exchange of oaths between their leaders. \nShort Bio: Savvas Kyriakidis received his PhD from the University of Birmingham. He has been a post doctoral Fellow at Princeton University and twice a research fellow at the Research Centre for Anatolian Civilizations at Koc University in Istanbul. After spending four years as a Research Fellow at the University of Johannesburg\, he received research fellowships from the New Europe College at Bucharest and from the Dumbarton Oaks Research Library at Harvard University. He has taught at Sabanci at Koc Universities in Istanbul\, at the Open University of Cyprus and at the Open University of Greece.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/fellow-seminar-oath-taking-and-oath-breaking-in-byzantium/
LOCATION:Център за академични изследвания София\, ул. Стефан Караджа 7В\, вх. 3\, ет. 2\, ап. 23\, София\, ‎ ‎1000‎ ‎\, Bulgaria
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Byzantine_army_taking_oath_before_the_battle_of_Anchialus.jpeg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210114T163000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20210114T183000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20210125T133106Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210125T133133Z
UID:10838-1610641800-1610649000@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Fellows seminar: A Possible Ally from the East: The Habsburg Intelligence and the Ottoman-Safavid Rivalry\, 1560s–1610s.
DESCRIPTION:Dr. Aneliya Stoyanova will present his research proposal on the topic: \nA Possible Ally from the East: The Habsburg Intelligence and the Ottoman-Safavid Rivalry\, 1560s–1610s.\non 14 January\, 2021 (Thursday) at 16:30 h. \nAbstract \nThe project examines the dependencies in the triangle of bilateral relations between three of the leading powers of the Early modern era – the Ottomans\, the Safavids\, and the Habsburgs. The series of Ottoman-Safavid wars in the extremely vibrant period of the late 16 th and early 17 th century temporarily hindered the military activity of the Sublime Porte in the Mediterranean and Central Europe. They were hence beneficial for both branches of the Habsburg dynasty based in Vienna and Madrid – prime antagonists of the Ottoman advance to the West. Furthermore\, the perception of the Ottomans as a common enemy lead to ambitious plans for cooperation and anti-ottoman alliances between the Habsburgs and the Safavids. The project explores how the Imperial court in Vienna/Prague understood the Ottoman-Safavid rivalry and tried to take advantage of it. By examining written sources\, produced by the Habsburg court and its diplomatic network\, the research aims at outlining the degree of acquaintance with different aspects of the manifold bilateral relations between the two Muslim states and also at answering the question whether the Safavids were viewed as potential allies or rather as a convenient distraction of the enemy’s powers from the Western front. Due to the lack of permanent contacts between the Emperor and the Shah\, it was the Habsburg intelligence in Istanbul that regularly provided Vienna/Prague with the latest information regarding the developments in the Ottoman-Safavid relations. The project brings to light the crucial practices of collecting and delivering information and its vital importance for the decision-making process at the Imperial court. It should further answer the question of how essential were both the official and the secret diplomatic moves. Since the examined connections remain poorly researched\, the expected results aim to contribute to the general study of Europe’s image of the East and more concretely to the study of the relationship of the Habsburgs with the Middle East. \nAneliya Stoyanova\, Ph.D. obtained her Bachelor (2011)\, Master (2013) and Ph.D. (2020) in History from Sofia University. Her scientific interests lay in the Early Modern history\, more specifically in intercultural diplomacy\, diplomatic intermediation and ceremony\, and social networking. Different aspects of the everyday life of European diplomats in the Ottomanempire\, and the history of diseases in the Early modern period are also subjects of her research. Her Ph.D. thesis (Vienna\, Madrid and the Habsburg–Ottoman relations\, 1555–1606) focuses on the solidarity between the two branches of the Habsburg dynasty in their relations with the Ottomans in the second half of the 16 th century. Aneliya Stoyanova was awarded a Richard Plaschka Scholarship (2015–2016) and a Ph.D. Scholarship of the Gerda Henkel Foundation (2018–2019) and has conducted several months of archival research in Austria and Spain.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/fellows-seminar-a-possible-ally-from-the-east-the-habsburg-intelligence-and-the-ottoman-safavid-rivalry-1560s-1610s-2/
LOCATION:Център за академични изследвания София\, ул. Стефан Караджа 7В\, вх. 3\, ет. 2\, ап. 23\, София\, ‎ ‎1000‎ ‎\, Bulgaria
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/ottoman-habsburg.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20201210T163000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20201210T180000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20210125T133157Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210125T133157Z
UID:10842-1607617800-1607623200@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Fellows seminar: Now you can! Upward mobility in new towns across Europe after World War Two.
DESCRIPTION:Dr. Albena Shkodrova (MON Diaspora Fellow\, Oct – Dec ‘20) will present her research at CAS under the topic: \nNow you can! Upward mobility in new towns across Europe after World War Two\n10 December\, 2020 at 16:30 h. \nModerated by Lyubomir Pozharliev \n– \nThe research project is a comparative study of social mobility in the new towns\, built in the 1950s and early 1960s in Bulgaria\, former Czechoslovakia\, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. It is a cross-European investigation into how these radical urban development projects\, which aimed to improve social advance opportunities\, were translated into reality. The research examines the similarities and divergences between East and West on the evolution of gender roles\, the tensions between generations\, old and new elites\, rural and urban groups. \nAfter The Second World War new towns emerged across Europe on clear grounds. From the United Kingdom to the countries of the Communist Bloc\, states engaged in sweeping projects of new town construction. Driven by pressing problems of urbanisation or urge to exploit natural resources\, in almost all cases they were also aiming at boosting social mobility. The social history of these urban projects across have attracted attention – more significant regarding the Eastern Bloc and growing in the West. However the history of social mobility in new towns has never been seriously compared across national borders. The absence of comparative perspectives is somewhat paradoxical\, since some parallels stand out clearly from the research in the East and the West. The investigations of these parallels are the research objectives of this project\, aiming to discuss comparatively the nature\, the effect and the renegotiation of the paradigms for equality\, which motivated the new towns’ construction. It enquires if\, how and for whom did the new towns provide social mobility in Europe across four division lines\, visible from the extant literature: gender social mobility; social mobility between old and new elites\, urban-rural social mobility\, s ocial mobility and generations. \nAlbena Shkodrova\, PhD\, is a historian and a writer. After a career in political journalism\, she worked as a travel writer and was for eight years the editor in chief of Bulgaria’s food and wine magazine Bacchus. She is the author of the popular book Communist Gourmet (2014)\, a bestseller in Bulgaria\, and of popular and academic articles on social history of food and everyday life\, some of which published in Gastronomica\, Food\, Culture and Society\, Food and History\, and Appetite. She has been a member of the research groups Social and Cultural History of Food (FOST) and Modernity and Society 1800–2000 (MoSa) in Belgium and is currently a researcher at the Centre for Social Movements in Bochum\, Germany. Her book Rebellious Cooks and Recipe Writing in Communist Bulgaria is expected release in early 2021 by Bloomsbury.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/fellows-seminar-now-you-can-upward-mobility-in-new-towns-across-europe-after-world-war-two/
LOCATION:Център за академични изследвания София\, ул. Стефан Караджа 7В\, вх. 3\, ет. 2\, ап. 23\, София\, ‎ ‎1000‎ ‎\, Bulgaria
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/labour_brigades_1024x585.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20201204T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20201204T180000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20201123T130023Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20201123T130133Z
UID:10664-1607097600-1607104800@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Серия семинари: „Форми на притежание – собствеността в комунистическа България“
DESCRIPTION:Центърът за академични изследвания София (ЦАИ) стартира цикъл от семинари на тема \nФорми на притежание: собствеността в комунистическа България\nВтората ни среща ще има следното съдържание и насоченост: \nПравото на собствена практика: Частните лекарски кабинети до 1972 г.\nЛектор: Надежда Гълъбова \nНезависим изследовател \nВодещ: доц. д-р Стоян Ставру \n27 ноември 2020 г. (петък)\, 16:00 ч.\nЦентър за академични изследвания\, ул. „Стефан Караджа“ № 7\, вх. „В“.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/%d1%81%d0%b5%d1%80%d0%b8%d1%8f-%d1%81%d0%b5%d0%bc%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%80%d0%b8-%d1%84%d0%be%d1%80%d0%bc%d0%b8-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%bf%d1%80%d0%b8%d1%82%d0%b5%d0%b6%d0%b0%d0%bd%d0%b8%d0%b5/
LOCATION:Zoom Platform
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Poznan-Zegrze-District-Polish-Bloki-architecture.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20201126T163000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20201126T180000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20210125T133333Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210125T133333Z
UID:10846-1606408200-1606413600@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Fellows seminar: Hidden Madness: Mental Health Governance in Socialist Bulgaria
DESCRIPTION:Dr. Vladimir Nakov (MON Fellow\, Oct ‘20 – Jun ‘21) will present his research project at CAS on the topic: \nHidden Madness: Mental Health Governance in Socialist Bulgaria\n26 November\, 2020 at 16:30 h. \nModerated by Alessandro Nannini. \n– \nBulgarian psychiatric history is\, to a significant extent\, an empty spot. What exists locally pertains to sanitized history written by psychiatrists themselves. The predominant impression is that they cannot or do not want to say what has happened\, what has been the private\, political\, material\, scientific\, life of the psychiatric field. Thus\, the key challenge is to explicate the hidden reality and dynamics of the field. \nThe project is focused on mapping and critically discussing the broad question of how the general ideological context molded and structured the local psychiatric field. Another way to pose the question is to ask what in fact has been the “socialist” in the psychiatry from that period. The intent is to identify the absences\, the hidden\, and the distortions resulting from its “socialist” nature and also on a micro level to follow those practices\, which may not be adversely affected by the ideology\, or even used as a mask to develop under and behind it (for example\, the presence of psychodynamic theories and practices behind the cover-up of their formal rejection and criticism which could be seen in child psychiatry for example). \nThis is an important issue\, not only from a historiographical perspective\, but also because it could help us better discern socialist legacies in the current psychiatric practice and remedy them where needed. The first objective would be to reconstruct the boundary maintaining mechanisms of the socialist psychiatry in Bulgaria. The second objective would be to trace the intersections of several different lines of development– juridical framework\, type and dynamics of the services\, the “material” milieu. The third objective is to throw some light on issues which were among the forbidden topics during the period – suicide and psychiatric abuse. Not many documents about psychiatry have been preserved\, key archives have been destroyed\, and there was ideological pushing forward of people without real contribution and the contribution of others was ignored\, especially from the period before 1944. \nThe study will use as many sources as possible and combine various qualitative methods\, including archival material\, and key professional journals during the period\, medical press. Another source of data would be interviews conducted with representatives of the generation\, whose professional lives are situated predominantly in the socialist period.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/fellows-seminar-hidden-madness-mental-health-governance-in-socialist-bulgaria/
LOCATION:Център за академични изследвания София\, ул. Стефан Караджа 7В\, вх. 3\, ет. 2\, ап. 23\, София\, ‎ ‎1000‎ ‎\, Bulgaria
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/640-420-klinikata-v-kurilo-psihotrilyr-sred-ruini.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20201119T163000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20201119T180000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20210125T133404Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210125T133404Z
UID:10850-1605803400-1605808800@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Fellows seminar: Competing Interests. State and Private actors in the Development of Black Sea Infrastructure in Russia and Bulgaria (1856–1914)
DESCRIPTION:Dr. Lyubomir Pozharliev will present his research proposal on the topic: \nCompeting Interests. State and Private actors in the Development of Black Sea Infrastructure in Russia and Bulgaria (1856–1914)\non 19 November\, 2020 (Thursday) at 16:30 h. \nModerated by Agoston Berecz \n– \nThe aim of the project is to research the competition and cooperation of state and commercial interests of key Russian and Bulgarian Governmental and entrepreneurial actors as a driver for long-term development of maritime infrastructure in the Black Sea region – the ports of Varna and Odessa. The objects of the research are The Russian Steam Navigation and Trading Company (founded in 1856) and the Bulgarian Commercial Steam Navigation Company (founded 1893). The studied period is between 1856 and the beginning of the WWI. The hypothesis of the study is that the construction of maritime infrastructure is a hybrid project\, the result of simultaneous confrontation and negotiation of presented as a common good strategies of Governmental and Imperial actors and the commercial interests of entrepreneurs and merchants. The transfer of knowledge is also important. This approach to the development of infrastructure explicates the complex character of the modernization processes\, in which the two modernization lines – through “top down” state intervention and by “down up” entrepreneurship and trade activities are entangled\, in constant tension and negotiation. The project follows the methodological frame of entangled modernities. The proposed method is interpretative analysis of official and personal documents\, related to the two companies. \nA comparative study of the development of maritime infrastructures in Odessa and Varna\, seen through the prism of the domination/negotiation of state and private interests has not been conducted to date. In addition to answering the question about the relationship between state and private interests in the construction and development of the maritime infrastructure in the two cases\, the study has the ambition to shed light on the modernization processes for which infrastructure construction is a main factor. \nThe study of the negotiation\, conflicts\, and striving for dominance of commercial vs. state interests will explicate the complex entanglement of two different lines of modernization – by top-down state intervention\, whose main priority is the establishment and protection of state sovereignty\, and modernization through trade development. It is accepted that the modernization development of Russia and Bulgaria followed the first model – modernization through the “strong arm” of centralized state power (Lieven 2015; Taki 2016; Dimitrov et al 1996). This presumption is obviously valid for Soviet Russia\, and is perceived as valid for the Russian Empire as well. The analysis of the cases of the two shipping joint-stock companies\, combining the interests both of entrepreneurs and merchants\, and the state\, could prove that modernization developments were much more complex\, with constant negotiation and confrontation\, or with periods of domination of one or the other type of interests. The current project could challenge the notion of a dominant model of modernization\, defending the more complex and resilient notion of “entangled modernities” (Randeria 2002) and “entangled histories” (Daskalov\, Mishkova 2013\, 2014\, 2015\, 2017) in the construction and development of infrastructure.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/fellows-seminar-competing-interests-state-and-private-actors-in-the-development-of-black-sea-infrastructure-in-russia-and-bulgaria-1856-1914/
LOCATION:Център за академични изследвания София\, ул. Стефан Караджа 7В\, вх. 3\, ет. 2\, ап. 23\, София\, ‎ ‎1000‎ ‎\, Bulgaria
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/photoholgic-rMujtQ3Olsc-unsplash.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20201030T093000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20201031T120000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20210125T133635Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210125T133635Z
UID:10862-1604050200-1604145600@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Workshop: Lost in Transition. Social Sciences\, Scenarios of Transformation\, and Cognitive Dissonances in East Central Europe after 1989
DESCRIPTION:Workshop: Lost in Transition: Social Sciences\, Scenarios of Transformation\, and Cognitive Dissonances in East Central Europe after 1989 \nWorking session on Zoom: 30-31 October\, 2020 \nThe first day of the workshop will be devoted to discussing and evaluating the individual research proposals of the second-round applicants for junior scholarships. On the second will each thematic group – economy\, state\, civil society\, social inclusion-exclusion\, and identity – will present its work in progress. \nTeam leaders and invited scholars: Bogdan Iancu\, Balazs Trencsenyi\, Daniel Smilov\, Diana Mishkova\, Dragos Aligica\, Ivana Spacis\, János Mátyás Kovács\, Jelena Vasiljevic\, Joanna Wawrzyniak\, Juraj Buzalka\, Marta Bucholc\, Michal Kopecek\, Roumen Avramov\, Violetta Zentai \nJunior scholars: Anna Calori\, Georgi Medarov\, Lukas Becht\, Marton Szarvas\, Ondřej Slačálek\, Tamara Petrovic\, and newly selected juniors scholars. \nMore about the project can be found HERE.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/workshop-lost-in-transition-social-sciences-scenarios-of-transformation-and-cognitive-dissonances-in-east-central-europe-after-1989/
LOCATION:Zoom Platform
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/rail-roads-transit.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20201023T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20201023T180000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20201006T090756Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20201006T092548Z
UID:10244-1603468800-1603476000@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Серия семинари:  "Форми на притежание - собствеността в комунистическа България"
DESCRIPTION:Центърът за академични изследвания София (ЦАИ) стартира цикъл от семинари на тема \nФорми на притежание: собствеността в комунистическа България\nСбирките ще се провеждат присъствено\, при спазване на противоепидемичните изисквания. \nПредстои първата среща\, с която ще открием поредицата от семинари: \n– Възходът на социалистическата собственост и спасяването на гражданското право в България –\nВодещ: доц. д-р Стоян Ставру \nИнститут по философия и социология – БАН\n23 октомври 2020 г. (петък)\, 16:00 ч. \nЦентър за академични изследвания\, ул. „Стефан Караджа“ № 7\, вх. „В“. \n– \nПроектът има за цел да представи различните форми на притежание\, които са били законово позволени или толерирани в комунистическа България. \nОтношението на социализма към собствеността е обективирано в множество ключови социалистически закони (например Закона за собствеността на гражданите\, Закона за наемите\, Закона за наемните отношения и пр. и пр.). Ликвидирането на частната собственост върху икономически активи (и ограничаването й до „лична“)\, както и сливането на кооперативната и социалистическата в „единна комунистическа собственост“\, са част от социалистическата утопия. За съжаление въпросите на социалистическата собственост не се преподават системно в историческите\, стопанските\, философските и юридическите факултети в България. Част от причините за това може би са свързани с все още смятаната за твърде кратка времева дистанция (30 години)\, но също и с отблъскващата монотонност на идеологическите клишета\, с които социализмът винаги е обграждал собствеността: те са до болка омръзнали на по-възрастните преподаватели\, а едновременно с това са неизвестни на по-младите. \nВ днешната епоха\, когато частната собственост е обявена за неприкосновена\, а публичната собственост е изтласкана в периферията на вещното право\, обществото ни се нуждае от осмисляне формите на притежание при социализма не само през съществувалата юридическа рамка\, но и чрез методологията на историята\, социологията\, икономиката и философията. Възможно е немалка част от проблемите на собствеността в България днес да отразяват наследството на социализма. Дали идеята за обобществяването на земеделските земи и за национализацията на горите не би могла да бъде успешно защитена и днес? Защо обществото с такава лекота приема\, че решението на проблемите\, свързани с функционирането на частната капиталистическа собственост\, следва да се търси в нейното обобществяване/одържавяване? Как се е отразила забраната да се притежават повече от едно жилище и една вила от едно семейство върху пазара на недвижими имоти през десетилетията на 21 век? Съществуват ли паралели между наемните отношения и т.нар. „самосгъстяване“ през социализма и огромното количество празни апартаменти в съвременна презастроена София? На какво ни „научиха“ дългите опашки пред празните магазини и чакането години на ред за закупуване на автомобили и други луксозни стоки през социализма? Как някогашните ограничения на личната собственост се проецират върху желанието на българите да притежават? Съществуват ли поуки\, които може да използваме от опита на социализма в областта на семейната собственост (историята на т.нар. съпружеска имуществена общност) и наследственото право (въвеждането на ограничения относно имуществото\, което може да се завещава\, включително предвиждането на запазена част за определени наследници\, която продължава да съществува като режим и до ден днешен)? Какви са социалистическите метаморфози на собствеността върху произведенията на изкуството\, литературата и науката и кое е по-опасно: да си автор или да си собственик? \nИдеята на проекта е да бъде организирана поредица от семинари\, където да се обсъдят тези и редица други въпроси. Водещи на семинарите ще са Стоян Ставру (Институт по философия и социология на БАН) и Румен Аврамов (ЦАИ). Дискусиите ще се провеждат в Центъра за академични изследвания (ЦАИ)\, който ще поеме организацията и логистиката на срещите.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/%d1%81%d0%b5%d1%80%d0%b8%d1%8f-%d1%81%d0%b5%d0%bc%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%80%d0%b8-%d1%84%d0%be%d1%80%d0%bc%d0%b8-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%bf%d1%80%d0%b8%d1%82%d0%b5%d0%b6%d0%b0%d0%bd%d0%b8%d0%b5-%d1%81/
LOCATION:Център за академични изследвания София\, ул. Стефан Караджа 7В\, вх. 3\, ет. 2\, ап. 23\, София\, ‎ ‎1000‎ ‎\, Bulgaria
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/NRB-herald-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20201022T163000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20201022T180000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20210125T133424Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210125T133424Z
UID:10854-1603384200-1603389600@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Fellows seminar: Narrating AI. Speculating through Science and Fiction on the Future of Machine and Human Intelligence
DESCRIPTION:Dr. Alexander Popov will present his research proposal on the topic: \nNarrating AI. Speculating through Science and Fiction on the Future of Machine and Human Intelligence\non 22 October\, 2020 (Thursday) at 16:30 h. \n \nArtificial intelligence (AI) systems have achieved tremendous successes\, such as driving automobiles in urban environments\, and beating the best human players at the world’s most difficult games. In parallel with the “AI revolution\,” researchers are becoming concerned with the problem of control: how to guarantee that if an artificial general intelligence is created\, its values would be aligned with human values. This project will focus on some of the proposed solutions to the AI alignment problem (Russell 2019). It will seek to operationalize the language of this paradigm for the purposes of the humanities and the social sciences. AI has already been productively engaged by a variety of disciplines along this spectrum\, among which: sociology and ethics (Wallach and Allen 2008)\, science and technology studies (Wilson 2011)\, phenomenology (Dreyfus 2007)\, literary theory (Ryan 1991)\, science fiction studies (Canavan 2015). The project will provide a bridge between these fields of study via the figure of AI as a narrative agent (and narrator) in contemporary speculative fiction (SF). Through its highly synthetic nature it will attempt to assemble new instruments for theorizing and historicizing SF\, and seek interdisciplinary convergence between broader fields of research. The presentation will outline these theoretical tools and the common framework that will be developed during the project\, so that they can be used in the experimental readings of SF texts. These tools will be drawn primarily from four broad fields: AI research\, phenomenology\, science and technology studies\, and literary theory. \nStuart Russell\, one of the most influential figures in AI\, has proposed inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) as a general strategy for AI alignment. IRL presents a computational agent with behavioral data from humans and forces it to infer on its own a reward schema for the task at hand\, based on the observable expert policy and reactions (e.g. satisfaction\, anger\, etc.). Researchers have used IRL to teach robots to emulate the walk of insects\, and self-flying helicopters to perform tricks previously achievable only by human pilots. Their hope is to use a version of this approach to make sure AIs can learn human values in complex social domains and in this way to ensure AI safety. However\, Russell’s research plan will inevitably be faced with many inherent difficulties\, such as human irrationality and biases\, long-term planning and temporal thinking\, preference inconsistency and instability\, and most importantly – the task of aggregating the preferences of multiple and/or collective agents in a way that resolves incompatibilities and cancels out malicious intent. \nFortunately\, AIs will have at their disposal a rich archive of human artifacts to learn from. They will therefore need to learn how to consume them: how to read literature\, interpret emotions\, etc. To accomplish this\, as the hypothesis of the project goes\, AI research needs to become more sensitive to the nexus of systems and apparatuses that govern human life – stretching from the material to the semiotic\, and even rethought as material-semiotic (Haraway 1990; Barad 2001). Such an approach can benefit from Hubert Dreyfus’ critique of symbolic AI and his contention that experiences of objects are not stored in the brain; they are the world itself. The affordances of the environment are “solicitations to act\,” and being-in-the-world is an openness to new ways of gripping the world and exploring the affordances of the environment. The figure of AI in SF is a convenient locus that amalgamates in narrative form all of these preoccupations: learning from the environment\, grappling with emergent consciousness\, and having to effectively combine conflicting human preferences. AI narrators are of particular interest\, since telling a coherent story is in some ways very much akin to understanding how a society functions\, how it resolves conflicts and how various agents comprising it coordinate among themselves to solve problems. The presentation will thus outline potential convergences between narratological theories about the structure of fictional stories and worlds\, and ideas from utopian studies\, which are preoccupied with the ways in which subjective values and goals are assembled at large spatio-temporal scales. Finally\, the project will think toward a theory of “ontological realism” – following Fredric Jameson (2005) and focusing on the works of Kim Stanley Robison. It will explore SF as a laboratory for constructing and evaluating ontological models and will argue that perhaps we can enrich our reading of such counterfactual scenarios\, if we adopt the point of view of AI readers learning to distill human preferences and to combine them – if not in utopia\, then at least in anti-anti-utopia. \n– \nAlexander Popov is a computational linguist who also works in the broad field of science fiction studies. He obtained his PhD in Informatics from the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences\, with a dissertation on the topic of lexical modeling in the context of artificial intelligence and natural language processing. He has worked on projects in the fields of machine translation\, automatic information extraction\, knowledge representation\, and digital reading. He studies literary texts mainly from the theoretical and methodological lenses of utopian studies\, ecocriticism and posthumanism\, and is also particularly interested in the language of science fiction – from a cognitive and literary-theoretic point of view. He is a long-time editor and author at “ShadowDance” – the oldest media outlet in Bulgaria dedicated to the speculative arts. He teaches science fiction at Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski.”
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/fellows-seminar-narrating-ai-speculating-through-science-and-fiction-on-the-future-of-machine-and-human-intelligence/
LOCATION:Център за академични изследвания София\, ул. Стефан Караджа 7В\, вх. 3\, ет. 2\, ап. 23\, София\, ‎ ‎1000‎ ‎\, Bulgaria
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/markus-winkler-tGBXiHcPKrM-unsplash.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20201015T163000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20201015T180000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20210125T133447Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210125T133447Z
UID:10858-1602779400-1602784800@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Fellows seminar: Aesthetics as “medicina mentis”? A Reconsideration of the Origins of Aesthetics as a Philosophical Science
DESCRIPTION:Dr. Alessandro Nannini will present his research proposal on the topic: \nAesthetics as “medicina mentis”? A Reconsideration of the Origins of Aesthetics as a Philosophical Science\non 15 October\, 2020 (Thursday) at 16:30 h. \nAbstract: \nAs has been widely known since the classical studies of Hadot\, Foucault\, and Nussbaum\, the understanding of philosophy as a medicine of the mind dates back to ancient philosophy. One of the most debated challenges in recent intellectual history has been to investigate the strategies through which this perspective has contributed to shaping the rise of the early modern thought (Caygill 2010; Giglioni 2016). While the conception of medicina mentis in this period was long seen just as a moral or theological metaphor (Harrison 2007)\, the latest scholarship has pointed out that the cure of the self and the purge of the mind from prejudices constitutes a specific feature of modernity\, ranging from rhetoric to morals\, from natural science to homiletics. This model is famously indebted to the Baconian tradition\, where the mind is regarded as distempered and haunted by idols\, thus requiring a regimen grounded on specific exercises in order to realign with external reality and regain serenity. As Giglioni\, Corneanu and Jalobeanu (Corneanu 2011; Jalobeanu 2015; Giglioni 2016) have claimed\, key in this process is the sharpening of the senses and the control over imagination\, so as to overcome self-delusion and devise methods for attaining practical wisdom. \nPrecisely the necessity to study and perfect sensibility according to its own laws leads the eighteenth-century German philosopher Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten (1714-1762) to found a specific discipline\, aesthetics\, understood as the “science of the sensuous cognition” (Aesthetica\, 1750\, § 1). However\, although one of the chief goals of aesthetics consists in the emendation of the senses and imagination\, as in the philosophical tradition of medicina mentis\, the role of aesthetics within this theoretical framework has hitherto been completely ignored. \nThe goal of my project is precisely to investigate for the first time the birth of scientific aesthetics in the light of the tradition of medicina mentis. My attempt is first of all to reconstruct the debate on the medicine of the mind in Germany in the era of the founding of aesthetics; on this basis\, I intend to analyze the strategies whereby nascent aesthetics resumes and renovates such a tradition; lastly\, I aim to examine how this appropriation makes a decisive contribution to the birth of modern psychotherapy in the mid-eighteenth century. In this sense\, so runs my working hypothesis\, not only does Baumgarten’s aesthetics play a pivotal role in the framework of medicina mentis\, but it is also crucial in the reconfiguration of medicina mentis as a full-fledged psychological therapy. \nIn this seminar\, I will focus on the broad outline of the project\, dealing in particular with the general question of why and how aesthetics could have emerged as a medicine for the mind and what role it was supposed to play in the preservation of health. I will leave aside for the moment the medical reception of aesthetics and its role in nascent psychotherapy. \nAlessandro Nannini studied at the University of Bologna\, earning a master degree in Philosophical Sciences and another one in Cultural Anthropology and Ethnology. He received his PhD in Philosophy from the University of Palermo. He was a research fellow at the University of Halle-Wittenberg\, Parma\, Jena\, Erfurt\, Bucharest\, at the Klassik Stiftung in Weimar\, and at the new Europe College in Bucharest. Currently\, he is a member of the research group “Philosophie allemande au 18e siècle” at the Ecole Normale Supérieure in Lyon. His research concerns the intellectual history and aesthetics of the Early Modern Age\, especially the German Enlightenment\, with particular regard to the intersections of philosophy\, history of science\, and Lutheran theology.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/fellows-seminar-aesthetics-as-medicina-mentis-a-reconsideration-of-the-origins-of-aesthetics-as-a-philosophical-science/
LOCATION:Център за академични изследвания София\, ул. Стефан Караджа 7В\, вх. 3\, ет. 2\, ап. 23\, София\, ‎ ‎1000‎ ‎\, Bulgaria
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/baumgarten.jpeg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20201006T170000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Sofia:20201006T183000
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20200906T085202Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20201006T085247Z
UID:10233-1602003600-1602009000@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Откриване на академичната 2020/2021 година в ЦАИ
DESCRIPTION:
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/%d0%be%d1%82%d0%ba%d1%80%d0%b8%d0%b2%d0%b0%d0%bd%d0%b5-%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%b0%d0%ba%d0%b0%d0%b4%d0%b5%d0%bc%d0%b8%d1%87%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%82%d0%b0-2020-2021-%d0%b3%d0%be%d0%b4%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%b0-%d0%b2/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/belinda-fewings-Z7bayFYwkaY-unsplash.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20200521
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20200522
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20200520T171512Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200520T171512Z
UID:6502-1590019200-1590105599@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Стипендиантски семинар
DESCRIPTION:Д-р Светослава Тончева ще представи онлайн своя проект на тема: "Living with or versus Nature? – Mitigation of Human-Bear Conflicts as a Bridge towards "Politics of Conviviality" на 21 май 2020 г. (четвъртък) от 16:30 ч.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/%d1%81%d1%82%d0%b8%d0%bf%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%b4%d0%b8%d0%b0%d0%bd%d1%82%d1%81%d0%ba%d0%b8-%d1%81%d0%b5%d0%bc%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%80/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/monika-kozub-dPQnP_w-wr0-unsplash.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20200514
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20200515
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20200520T171512Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200520T171512Z
UID:6505-1589414400-1589500799@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Стипендиантски семинар
DESCRIPTION:Доц. д-р Ирина Гордеева ще представи онлайн своя проект на тема: "Tolstoyans and International Pacifist Movement in the 1920-1930s: The Early History of European Transnational Solidarity" на 14 май 2020 г. (четвъртък) от 16:30 ч.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/%d1%81%d1%82%d0%b8%d0%bf%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%b4%d0%b8%d0%b0%d0%bd%d1%82%d1%81%d0%ba%d0%b8-%d1%81%d0%b5%d0%bc%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%80-2/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/tolst2.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20200430
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20200501
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20200520T171513Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200520T171513Z
UID:6508-1588204800-1588291199@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Стипендиантски семинар
DESCRIPTION:Д-р Алесандро Нанини ще представи онлайн своя проект на тема: "Aesthetics as "medicina mentis"? A Reconsideration of the Origins of Aesthetics as a Philosophical Science" на 30 април 2020 г. (четвъртък) от 16:30 ч.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/%d1%81%d1%82%d0%b8%d0%bf%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%b4%d0%b8%d0%b0%d0%bd%d1%82%d1%81%d0%ba%d0%b8-%d1%81%d0%b5%d0%bc%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%80-3/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/baumgarten.jpeg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20200423
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20200424
DTSTAMP:20261017T040344
CREATED:20200520T171514Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200520T171514Z
UID:6511-1587600000-1587686399@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Стипендиантски семинар
DESCRIPTION:Д-р Нилай Килинч ще представи онлайн своя проект на тема: "Highly-Skilled Turkish Migrants' Search for ‘Alternative Diaspora Spaces' in Europe: How Do They Build Social and Career Networks Beyond the ‘Cultures of Rejection'?" на 23 април 2020 г. (четвъртък) от 16:30 ч.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/%d1%81%d1%82%d0%b8%d0%bf%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%b4%d0%b8%d0%b0%d0%bd%d1%82%d1%81%d0%ba%d0%b8-%d1%81%d0%b5%d0%bc%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%80-4/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/joanna-nix-Kp1Oz5fSxiw-unsplash.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20200416
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20200417
DTSTAMP:20261017T040345
CREATED:20200520T171514Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200520T171514Z
UID:6514-1586995200-1587081599@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Стипендиантски семинар
DESCRIPTION:Д-р  Стоян Шиваров ще представи онлайн своя проект на тема: "Lost Pages: (Ottoman) Turkish Language Periodicals in Bulgaria (1878 – 1944). Muslim Tradition versus Nationalism" на 16 април 2020 г. (четвъртък) от 16:30 ч.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/%d1%81%d1%82%d0%b8%d0%bf%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%b4%d0%b8%d0%b0%d0%bd%d1%82%d1%81%d0%ba%d0%b8-%d1%81%d0%b5%d0%bc%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%80-5/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/jj-ying-WmnsGyaFnCQ-unsplash.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20200409
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20200410
DTSTAMP:20261017T040345
CREATED:20200520T171515Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200520T171515Z
UID:6517-1586390400-1586476799@cas.bg
SUMMARY:Стипендиантски семинар
DESCRIPTION:Проф. Маргарет Димитрова ще представи онлайн своя проект на тема: "The Athonite Monk Panteleimon (ca. before 1785 – after 1850): An Excellent Bulgarian Preacher" на 9 април 2020 г. (четвъртък) от 16:30 ч.
URL:https://cas.bg/bg/sabitie/%d1%81%d1%82%d0%b8%d0%bf%d0%b5%d0%bd%d0%b4%d0%b8%d0%b0%d0%bd%d1%82%d1%81%d0%ba%d0%b8-%d1%81%d0%b5%d0%bc%d0%b8%d0%bd%d0%b0%d1%80-6/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://cas.bg/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/damaskin.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR