Individual projects
Project Outline
The political transition that took place in Eastern Europe almost two decades ago has brought geopolitically, legally and socially about significant changes to the societies involved, leaving their imprint on the countries' development for the subsequent years. The proposed research intends to analyse major societal and legal changes in the post-communist societies, in general, and Slovenia, in particular. It investigates the reasons behind, and effects of the changes on social trust and the loci of power and authority by drawing upon the achievements of the legal, sociological, criminological and social psychological sciences and on empirical evidence. Together, they are believed to provide new insights into the implications of these changes for social stability.
A closer look is taken at social trust in the judicial system and criminal law as they best reflect the (changes in) social values. This influence is not, however, analysed purely unidirectional as the law is recognised to be both influenced and influencing by nature. Hence, the research reflects upon the role of law and legal discourse in generating (dis)trust.
Considering that the media plays an important role in communicating and generating social representations - which, in turn, inform and fuel people's attitudes, values, beliefs, which affect trust - the project also examines its role in the formation of social trust. In conjunction with concrete examples of the changes in authority, order and trust and of the responses to these challenges locally, in Slovenia, and internationally, these insights are applied to assess whether the changes (and responses) are societyspecific or whether they are, at least in part, epiphenomena of a much more global(ised) trend. An explanation is sought for the emerging similarities, and possible solutions to tackle the decreasing social trust suggested.
The project hopes to call into discussion the structural and epistemological preconditions of the changes in social trust and authority, identified as changes in social security, in the part played by controversial denationalisation processes, and as a lack of viable political alternatives in the negotiation process for the accession to the European Union.
Project Outline
This interdisciplinary study traces the historically specific ways of functioning of the legal regulator (Bulgarian criminal law) in three social contexts: the Bulgarian society in the period after the end of Ottoman rule, the early socialist period and postsocialist society. It requires an analysis of law from a double point of view: law as encompassing the qualitative peculiarities of the socio-historical context and law as a necessary component of that context's systemic-structural reproduction.
The goals of the study are:
- To outline the structure and logic of the field of social relations which are the object of normative impact by criminal law in the three socio-historical contexts, define the degree and zones of social inefficiency of the penal legal regulation, and identify probable extralegal, and therefore socio-structural (historical and current), causes acting counter to the efficient penal legal regulation;
- To estimate the relative social weight of these relations within the context of the overall social life along the limits of the actual applicability of penal regulations and determine the sociological indicators of the historical changeability of penal legal regulation in the Bulgarian society not only in structure, form and contents but also by relative social weight;
- To describe the historical dynamics and changeability of penal regulations in Bulgarian society and establish the type of new social relations and/or ‘outdated' relations integrated in or excluded from the texture of criminal law; to fix the limits of tensions of criminal law with the other normative systems and uncover possible forms of ‘normative dualism' in the same circle of relations;
- To analyse the power intensity of penal legal regulation in the transition to a new socio-historical context, i.e., establish the proportion between the elements of reflection, values and prescription; define the transformation in the generalised method of impact (dynamics between the dispositive and the imperative methods); the basic strategy and tactical instruments of regulation; the structures of governance and level of political intervention; and the degree and forms of rationality of Bulgarian legal system; and last but not least,
- ‘To measure' the level of authority of and trust in criminal law in Bulgarian.
Project Outline
The proposed research is based on the discussion of the postulate that the Methodenstreit, which broke out after the publication of the Deutsche Geschichte by German historian Karl Lamprecht in 1891, was not a German but a transnational event, though having different political connotations in various European countries and the Westernising world.
The proposed research project investigates the complex interplay of local traditions and ‘imported’ intellectual products of the Lamprecht controversy, which reached Finland in the very beginning of the twentieth century. The emphasis is placed on the appropriation and mediation of the Lamprechtian ideas in early twentieth-century Finnish historiography as reflected in the first Finnish historical journal, Historiallinen Aikakauskirja, and debates at the Historical Association of Finland.
While previous research done on the subject has (fully justifiably) emphasised the nationalistic aspects of the Finnish Lamprechtianism, the proposed project would like to broaden the scope and include its transnational dimension. Hence, three goals have been formulated:
- to explore the Methodenstreit evoked by Lamprecht and the further developments of the Lamprechtian paradigm of historical scholarship as a part of the transnational reconfiguration of the ideological landscape of the period;
- to analyse how the Finnish Lamprechtianists debate dealt with the questions of modernity and identity, inherently related to the reconceptualisation of the ‘national self’;
- to study the complex processes of cultural transfer and appropriation in Europe, by starting out with a scholar such as Lamprecht, who was almost totally rejected in his native German Reich but, nevertheless, cherished in the ‘small-state’ regions of Eastern and Northern Europe.
As a contribution to the overall research goals of the Regimes of Historicity project, the proposed project aims at investigating the complex interplay between national and transnational horizons as well as the border-crossing nature of ideas and of intellectuals as a group. Considering the popularity of Lamprechtianism in various European ‘small-states’, this study may also serve as a basis for establishing connections between traditions which were not having a direct impact on each other but were participating in comparable projects of ‘domesticating’ modernity.
Moreover, the proposed project questions the conventional, modernist model of cultural transfer, which assumes a rather passive assimilation of new ideas, conceived in the ‘dynamic centre‘, and leading the way for an assimilating ‘periphery’. Instead, it views cultural appropriation and mediation as bearing witness to a highly creative process, in which – due to adjustments to a new environment, alterations occurring in the transmitted messages, and the crossing of linguistic frontiers – initial Central European ideas grew out of their conception and essentially diverged from their origin. Since such creative appropriations in small European nations are usually ignored by international research, the proposed project hopes to contribute to a more balanced picture of historical differences and multiple modernities in Europe.
Project Outline
The research project addresses the question how the expansion and diversification of higher education relates to characteristics, such as openness and inclusion. It concentrates on the legal mechanisms for the provision of financial support (grants) to university students in Bulgaria and Germany, and explores the relevance of university fees for securing or preventing the access of wider social strata to education. While Bulgaria has recently adopted a law for students' credits, the latter's mechanism of implementation has not been developed yet. Hence, a controversy emerges between the legal and everyday practice, which results into low trust in law.
The project aims to examine the effects of legislation on educational motivation, and focuses on its influence on young people's individual decisions and strategies. In addition, the proposed research attempts to analyse the normative regulations in education from a gender perspective. It hopes to question the routine practice of setting gender quotas for enrollment in academia, as some disciplines of usually strong female preference, preschool teachers, nurses, librarians), do not grant an university degree.
The project is designed on a case-oriented, comparative research basis. The focus falls on how strongly organisational variations across countries, and between Bulgaria and Germany in particular, affect the relation between social class and personal achievement in education.
Project Outline
Albeit each in a different end, the post-Communist societies have many aspects in common. In particular, they need to reconcile the alleged need for academic (research) freedom and the independence of the judiciary with the ‘must' of internal reforms.
The proposed research project examines a series of questions related to the transformations of the professions, including self-administration versus external administration issues, funding and resource control, the renewal of the profession, entry and exit conditions, foreclosure, questions of hierarchy (elites and oligarchy) within each profession, as well as the ways, in which authority is generated.
The project adopts a comparative and interdisciplinary approach. It draws on a comparative analysis of the situation in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, and hopefully, Hungary, Bulgaria and Romania. It subscribes to the assumption voiced by the Shaken Order Project that ‘the common totalitarian past does not predetermine a common present'. Hence, it hopes to build a working hypothesis in the course of research on trust in the process of transformation of self-regulated (self-contained) professions, thus avoiding overreaching conclusions.
Project Outline
The process of modernisation, acculturation and secularisation of the Jewish communities in Europe has been traditionally described in analogous terms, regardless of the community or country analysed. Nevertheless, recent studies have prompted that this generic process might have varied for each country or case-study, according to the specificity of each Jewish community involved, and the corresponding cultural, religious, political, and socio-economic peculiarities of the particular Gentile society in question. The topic of the proposed research places the historicity frame represented by the generational debate and its perception as a concept at the crossroad of modernisation, identity debate and its representation.
Comparisons between the Central European and Romanian modernisation and Jewish identity pattern in generational terms suggests a permanent tension between he cultural, political and social conditions set by the specificity of the Jewish, but also Gentile communities in both cases. Hence, by focusing on the generational identity changes representedpublicly and debated intellectually, the proposed research work analyses the connection between modernity and historicity to be found at the core of the identity discourses among the Jewish intellectuals of Romanian languages during the interwar period. It aims to connect debates on modernity, historicity, and identity in a larger equation relevant for both the Jewish Romanian intellectual life, and Romanian history in the interwar historiography. By building on the cultural instrumentalisation of the concept of generation, the proposed research hopes to reach roader conclusions in terms of the social, cultural and political life during the interwar period.
Project Outline
The question of social trust in the legitimacy of law-producing and lawimplementing institutions is closely related with individuals' experiences especially in countries with state-sponsored regimes of repression and violence. In Bulgaria and Greece, memories of past repressions, contributed to endemic distrust in public authority and its legal institutions until today. The current research project focuses on the present schisms and heritage from experiences of radical changes, political instabilities and discontinuities. It intends to enlarge the problematic of the hidden order and social distrust by studying the instrumentalised dichotomy between ‘people from the Left' and ‘people from the Right' in the light of the labelling process of individuals and groups as belonging to ‘ours' or ‘others'.
The concrete questions to be explored focus on:
- How do social actors describe the political other in the context of their everyday interactions?
- How does genealogy link to political belongings and to the process of construction, maintenance, invention or re-invention of a coherent account of one's ‘pure' Rightist/Leftist identity?
- How does the mechanism of exclusion and/or inclusion work in the interactions between individuals and when do socially-attached etiquettes assume a stigmatising or, inversely, prestigious social role?
- How do Right or Left belongings shape an intimate ‘internal order', especially with regard to the micro-universe of family relationships?
- What is at stake in Left/Right competing historiographies?
- Within this almost ethnic fracture, how do individuals experience the extreme politicisation of legal, social and political institutions and find ways to transcend their ‘embeddedness'?
The project hopes to shed light on sentiments of distrust and lack of confidence on law and legal institutions by extracting from social relations those fundamental divisions that lead to the extreme politicisation of social life and create endemic affiliations to the rightist or leftist space in society.
Project Outline
The proposed research project aims at studying the particular reasons for the inefficiency of the constitutional and legal system in the Central and Eastern European countries. Its analytical framework encompasses the political and institutional experience driven from the process of social change in Bulgaria after 1989. It focuses on the challenges - social, political and legal - to the designed constitutional model in Bulgaria, on types of threats to that model and present safeguards for the constitutional supremacy. The degree of citizens' attention and attitude to the constitution is analysed as a litmus test for the level of democratic development and potential in the civil society.
The project examines the social preconditions for an effective constitutional and legal regulator in the post-communist societies, the latter having undertaken radical institutional reforms to meet the political and economic standards of the developed Western democracies. The study also critically investigates the connections of the present political elite in Bulgaria to the former communist party and the secret services and attempts to explore the ways these links might influence the process of institutional decisionmaking behind the institutionalised forms and means of the legislative process.